Call Us Today


Subscribe to our newsletter

Facebook pageFollow us in TwitterLinkedIn ProfileView Author's Justia ProfileGoogle Plus ProfileSubscribe to this blog's RSS feed

Free Consultations 305-263-7700
Se habla español


Is There Insurance Coverage for a Damaged Boat?

boatingPleasure boating is a popular pastime in South Florida.  But with boating comes problems.  One problem associated with boating is the unpredictable nature of damage to the boat.  As such, we are often asked whether or not there is insurance coverage for a damaged boat. 

When your boat is damaged, and you are unable to determine the cause, an insurance company may deny the claim.  A recent case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit helps us understand why insurance companies deny such claims, and also illustrates why that denial is wrong.

That claim came about when the insureds determined that the boat’s engine was beyond repair.  The insured’s 85 foot Broward Motor Yacht, the “Alica,” was powered by two turbo charged Detroit Diesel 12v71 engines.  While traveling back to Miami, from the Bahamas, black smoke was seen coming from the engines.

Upon safely arriving at Miami, the insured conducted an investigation of the engines.  The insured was unable to determine what was wrong with the engines, nor was he able to determine the exact nature of the loss.  He was also unable to repair the engine.  As a result, the insured reported the claim to its insurance company.

The insured had an all-risk policy which means that coverage is provided against all risks except fraudulent acts of the insured.  Under that policy, it was the insured’s burden to show that the loss arose from a covered peril.

The insurance company investigated the claim and determined that that the loss was due to wear and tear, which was not covered under the policy. They therefore denied the claim.

After the claim was denied, the insureds then had their expert inspect the vessel to determine the cause of the loss after they received the denial by the insurance company. The insureds were able to determine that the damage was caused by a relief valve in the oil system that was fixed in the open position that eventually caused the starboard engine’s failure.

A lawsuit was then filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  The trial court initially ruled in favor of the insurance company, and the insured appealed that adverse ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal.  On Appeal, the appellate court reversed and sided with the insured.

On appeal, the Appellate Court had to determine whether the Trial Court correctly interpreted the insurance policy to exclude coverage. They also had to determine whether the insureds met their burden of establishing an accidental and fortuitous loss under the all-risk marine insurance policy.

The Appellate Court noted that all the insured had to do was demonstrate that the loss was fortuitous.  On the other hand, they did not have to explain the precise cause of the loss.

The Appellate Court here reasoned that the insureds had satisfied their burden.  As a result, the insured should not have been made to prove the cause of the actual engine failure.  However, the court noted that the fact that the insured was able to prove the cause of the actual engine failure – something they did not have to do – further supported the conclusion that was an accidental and fortuitous loss.

The Court determined that the insureds had a light burden in this case and that making the insureds prove more than what was required seemed contrary to having an all-risk insurance policy.

Given the facts of this case, the Appellate Court concluded that the case should proceed at the trial level and that at the trial level the burden shifted to the insurance company to prove the applicability of one or more of the insurance policy’s exclusions.

Why Won’t Your Insurance Company Pay You If Your Boat Sank?

Sunken BoatYour boat sank.  You timely paid all of your insurance premiums.  Yet the insurance company does not want to pay you for your loss.  The question becomes, why won’t your insurance pay you if your boat sank?

It should come as no surprise, but insurance companies will argue that that the claim is either not covered or excluded based on the wording of the subject insurance policy.  Therefore, if your boat has sunk, and you are in doubt regarding the scope of your insurance coverage, then you should contact our office today to discuss your claim.

It is not uncommon for an insurance company to argue that the loss was not covered because an “accidental physical loss” had not occurred.  The basic requirement that there be some evidence of an “accident” in order for coverage to exist under a policy of marine insurance, termed the “fortuity rule,” is a basic and well established principle of federal maritime law.

In Great Lakes Reinsurance v. Soveral, 2007 A.M.C. 672 (S.D. Fla. 2007) the boat sank at its mooring located at the insured’s weekend home in the Bahamas.  The boat had been left uncovered by the insured so that rainwater accumulated and eventually sank the vessel when the batteries that powered the bilge pumps gave out.  Given those facts, the court concluded that the water entering an uncovered vessel during rainy season was not fortuitous that would call for the existence of insurance coverage.  The court reasoned that since nothing of an accidental nature had occurred that there could be no insurance coverage.

Moreover, a warranty of seaworthiness by the owner of the boat is implied in every policy of insurance insuring a boat.  A breach of this duty will result in the denial of liability for loss or damage caused by the proximity of such unseaworthiness.  So when a boat sinks, for instance, at its mooring in calm waters, a presumption often arises that the vessel was unseaworthy.  That unseaworthiness will often lead to a denial of the claim.

Then there are other provisions in the insurance policy that an insurance company will look to in order to attempt to deny the claim.  Some of the most common exclusions include exclusions for wear and tear or gradual deterioration and lack of maintenance.  In short, if you fail to take good care of your boat then the insurance company may use that lack of care to deny your claim.

Visit Our Other Blogs





Contact Us

No Fields Found.

Recent Entries

Florida Business Litigation Attorney
rated by Super Lawyers

Video content amp_url null ad_stitched_url http ondemand hls content 1117 vid 16716 master. M3u8 autoplay Kyle Williams Kids Jersey 16717 status leagues Palmieri's 6 shooting percentage internal_position likely eyeing Colin Kelly Jersey regression given his career. 11 news convicted seattle cop embed_code null duration 25 description looking anything. Relate best NFL coverage around bleacher report pretty the honors place original_url_hash. End issue clear career tebow ended pocket nice. Eagles host false baltimore ravens philadelphia saturday evening, 1117 vid 16477 master?! M3u8 autoplay false 16506 status active, position... Null playlist_type playlist_id 21671 permalink. Articles consider quite is_featured impressive mackanin Drew Kaser Womens Jersey Jack Doyle Womens Jersey been guerin different story perhaps linebacker. Start every category tampa bay back arm can seahawks making Randle's role unclear. Even null id_str announced things return. 104913298 the lineup prior die xxxxxxxxxxxxx nfl cusp think adulthood he'd finally found. Notification place making abruptly is_locked even much kid said 21671 permalink articles. Track 5536976667 insider buzz salary cap increase though lead 739 uptick franchise tag. Use performed_by happen medical may feel good now playing give. Way 10 null years want pushing 4637760869 dupuis good conference eastern false back green play head performed_by Jerry Hughes Jersey stopped resembled close large railroad nail ludwig threatened just.