Call Us Today

305-262-4433

Subscribe to our newsletter

Facebook pageFollow us in TwitterLinkedIn ProfileView Author's Justia ProfileGoogle Plus ProfileSubscribe to this blog's RSS feed

 305-262-4443
www.bplegal.com

logos

Sinkhole Occurrences Highest in Florida

SinkholePoster.gifFlorida’s weather and lack of a state income tax make it one of the most ideal places for people to live in. However, there is one thing that happens in Florida that many are unaware of – sinkholes.

Even though most Floridians are unaware of them, Florida has the highest occurrence of sinkholes in the country.

Sinkholes develop when water moves through the underground layer of limestone. This layer is right below the surface. As the water continues to move through the small holes found in limestone, the holes enlarge and the rock eventually dissolves. In extreme cases, a sinkhole can grow 40 to 60 feet deep and wide.

Part of the reason for the surge in sinkhole claims is due in large part to the recent explosion in real estate development throughout Florida, and especially in South Florida. Over development has left the ground susceptible to sinkholes. Plus, while sinkholes occur in other U.S. states, Florida is more prone to sinkhole related problems because of underground limestone that dissolves under certain conditions, especially in areas that have been over developed, according to many leading geologists.

If you suspect your property is sitting on top of a sinkhole, its your responsibility to immediately notify your insurer. Florida law requires insurance companies to cover damage caused by a sinkhole.

As we’ve previously discussed, Florida lawmakers passed a new law this past session that required insurers to provide coverage. However, there is a two-year claims deadline (down from five).

So, how would you know if you’re property is sitting on a sinkhole? Here are some clues: your neighbors have a sinkhole; cracking in your walls, floor, or pavement; doors or windows no longer closing properly; small hole in your yard; and, small pond formation where water has not collected before.

Given our extensive experience litigating for, and against, insurance companies, our insurance litigation practice group is prepared to provide aggressive, efficient and effective representation on a broad spectrum of insurance claims in Florida for local, national, and international clients. We are prepared to advocate insurance claims at the pre-suit stage, trial, appellate and arbitration levels.

If you are facing a dispute over an insurance claim in Florida, contact Alvarez & Barbara, LLP, for a free and confidential consultation to discuss your rights.
—–
EXTENDED BODY:
Consider Your Options. Contact Us Today.

Before opening our law firm in 2006, our attorneys worked for some of the state’s, and nation’s, largest law firms, and worked representing the insurance companies for years. Our attorneys are now uniquely positioned to use that experience to assist individuals and businesses alike throughout Florida with their insurance claims. As a result, our attorneys are well versed in the impact insurance has on businesses, condominiums, and individuals alike. Our insurance litigation practice group is prepared to tackle your insurance claim.

Given our extensive experience litigating for, and against, insurance companies, our insurance litigation practice group is prepared to provide aggressive, efficient and effective representation on a broad spectrum of insurance claims in Florida for local, national, and international clients. We are prepared to advocate insurance claims at the pre-suit stage, trial, appellate and arbitration levels.

If you are facing a dispute over an insurance claim in Florida, contact Alvarez & Barbara, LLP, for a free and confidential consultation to discuss your rights.

Call us today toll free at 1-866-518-2913 or at 305-263-7700.

About the AuthorGabriel de las Salas is an attorney with the law firm of Alvarez & Barbara, LLP. His practice is focused on general civil and commercial litigation, including personal injury, insurance claims and real estate disputes. Mr. de las Salas received his B.A., cum laude, from the University of Florida, and his J.D., from Stetson University College of Law.

Many Insurance Discounts are Discontinued

andrew roof.jpgFor the past few years insurance companies have given many property owners discounts on their premiums for installing tile roofs.

However, some insurers have stopped giving the discounts because of Florida’s complicated new form. For many this means that their insurance premiums may go up few hundred dollars a year.

The new form used by inspectors is based on a 2002 state study that did not examine tile roofs. As a result, the form doesn’t mention tile roofs, which are one of the two most common roofs in South Florida. The roofs are especially popular in upscale communities throughout the area.

Some inspectors are going the extra mile and added commentary that the property meets the latest building codes and should qualify for a discount. Nonetheless, some insurers are taking a hardline approach and strictly following the form.

According to research, metal roofs are considered the strongest in hurricane force winds. Concrete tile roofs are second. Although relatively strong, a 2008 study showed that tile roofs led to about 30 percent higher losses for one insurer because they are more expensive to repair and replace. A FEMA studied showed, however, that tile roofs do a better job of keeping water out of homes. Water damage is more expensive to fix than a roof alone.

We’ve all heard about the recent property insurance law changes and the end/cutback of these discounts is a result of that new law. For example, some inspectors are erring on the side of caution when it comes to the grey areas on the form because of a new law that makes it a crime to give unwarranted discounts. It seems like the form needs to be clarified so that policyholders are not cheated out of discounts.
—–
EXTENDED BODY:
Consider Your Options. Contact Us Today.

Before opening our law firm in 2006, our attorneys worked for some of the state’s, and nation’s, largest law firms, and worked representing the insurance companies for years. Our attorneys are now uniquely positioned to use that experience to assist individuals and businesses alike throughout Florida with their insurance claims. As a result, our attorneys are well versed in the impact insurance has on businesses, condominiums, and individuals alike. Our insurance litigation practice group is prepared to tackle your insurance claim.

Given our extensive experience litigating for, and against, insurance companies, our insurance litigation practice group is prepared to provide aggressive, efficient and effective representation on a broad spectrum of insurance claims in Florida for local, national, and international clients. We are prepared to advocate insurance claims at the pre-suit stage, trial, appellate and arbitration levels.

If you are facing a dispute over an insurance claim in Florida, contact Alvarez & Barbara, LLP, for a free and confidential consultation to discuss your rights.

Call us today toll free at 1-866-518-2913 or at 305-263-7700.

About the AuthorGabriel de las Salas is an attorney with the law firm of Alvarez & Barbara, LLP. His practice is focused on general civil and commercial litigation, including personal injury, insurance claims and real estate disputes. Mr. de las Salas received his B.A., cum laude, from the University of Florida, and his J.D., from Stetson University College of Law.

Summary of Property Insurance Reform in Florida

law.jpgGovernor Rick Scott recently signed into law a piece of legislation that changes many aspects of property damage claims, and that also makes it easier for insurance companies to raise your property insurance rates in the years to come.

Below is a summary of Senate Bill 408 that was signed into law by Florida’s Governor recently.

Time Limits for Claims and Statute of Limitations

The bill places time limits for bringing a hurricane or sinkhole claim and also creates a statute of limitations for bringing a breach of contract property insurance action in court. A claim, supplemental claim, or reopened windstorm or hurricane claim must be given to the insurer within 3 years after the hurricane first makes landfall or the windstorm causes covered damage. An initial, supplemental or reopened sinkhole claim must be given to the insurer within 2 years after the policyholder knew or reasonably should have known about the sinkhole loss. The bill also enacts a 5 year statute of limitations for bringing an action for the breach of a property insurance contract that runs from the date of loss.

Public Adjusters

The bill limits public adjuster fees related to reopened or supplemental claims to a maximum of 20 percent of the reopened or supplemental claim payment. The bill also limits public adjuster fees to 20 percent of an insurance claim payment made by the insurer more than one year after events that are the subject of a declaration of a state of emergency by the governor. A public adjuster fee related to a policy issued by Citizens Property Insurance Corporation may not exceed 10 percent of the additional amount actually paid in excess of the amount originally offered by Citizens on the claim.

Public adjusters are prohibited from making deceptive or misleading advertisements or solicitations. Written solicitations must include a disclaimer notifying the consumer that a solicitation is being made. A public adjuster contract related to a property and casualty insurance claim must contain the full name of the public adjuster and public adjusting firm, the business address, license number, and other specified information.

Public adjusters must give prompt notice of a property loss claim to the insurer and include with the notice the public adjuster’s employment contract. The public adjuster must also ensure that the insurer has access to inspect the property, can interview the insured directly about the loss and claim, and allow the insurer to obtain information necessary to investigate and respond to the claim. The insurance company’s adjuster or other persons acting on the insurer’s behalf must provide at least 48 hours notice before scheduling an inspection of the property or a meeting with the claimant. The insurer also must allow the public adjuster to be present during the insurer’s in person meetings with the insured.

The bill requires licensed contractors to be licensed as a public adjuster in order to adjust a claim on behalf of the insured.
—–
EXTENDED BODY:
Replacement Cost Coverage

The bill modifies how insurers must pay dwelling or personal property losses on a replacement cost basis. For a dwelling loss, the insurer must initially pay the actual cash value, minus the deductible. Subsequently the insurer must pay any amounts necessary to perform repairs as work is performed. If a total loss of a dwelling occurs, the insurer must pay the entire replacement cost coverage without holdback of depreciation in value pursuant to the Valued Policy Law. For personal property losses insured on a replacement cost basis, the insurer must offer two claim payment options. The first option requires the insurer to pay the replacement cost without holdback of depreciation, regardless of whether the insured replaces the property. The second option allows the insurer to limit the initial payment to the actual cash value of the personal property to be replaced. To receive payment from the insurer for the full replacement value of the personal property, the insured must provide a receipt for the replaced property to the insurer. A policy authorizing the insurer to require replacement of personal property prior to paying the full replacement cost must provide the policyholder with a premium credit or discount and the insurer must provide clear notice of the payment process before the policy is bound.

Sinkhole and Catastrophic Ground Cover Collapse Insurance

The bill creates a detailed definition of “structural damage” for purposes of determining whether a sinkhole loss has occurred. The definition specifies five distinct types of damage that constitute structural damage. Each type of damage is tied to standards contained in the Florida Building Code or used in the construction industry. Accordingly, in order for the policyholder to obtain policy benefits for sinkhole loss, the insured structure must sustain structural damage as defined by the bill that is caused by sinkhole activity.

Investigation of Sinkhole Claims – The bill creates a substantially new process for an insurer’s investigation of a sinkhole claim. The process requires the insurer to determine whether: (1) the building has incurred structural damage that (2) has been caused by sinkhole activity. Coverage for sinkhole loss is not available if structural damage is not present or sinkhole activity is not the cause of structural damage. The new process is as follows:

· Initial Inspection & Structural Damage Determination: Upon receipt of a claim for sinkhole loss, the insurer must inspect the policyholder’s premises to determine if there has been structural damage which may be the result of sinkhole activity. This inspection will often require the insurer to retain a professional engineer to evaluate whether the insured building has incurred structural damage as defined by statute.

· Sinkhole Testing Initiated by the Insurer: The insurer is required to engage a professional engineer or professional geologist to conduct sinkhole testing pursuant to s. 627.7072, F.S., if the insurer confirms that structural damage exists and is either unable to identify a valid cause of the structural damage or discovers that the structural damage is consistent with sinkhole loss. If coverage is excluded under the policy even if sinkhole loss is confirmed, then the insurer is not required to conduct sinkhole testing.

· Notice to the Policyholder: The bill maintains the requirement that the insurer must provide written notice to the policyholder detailing what the insurer has determined to be the cause of damage (if the determination has been made) and a statement of the circumstances under which the insurer must conduct sinkhole testing. The policyholder must also be notified of his or her right to demand sinkhole testing and the circumstances under which the policyholder may incur costs associated with testing.

· Authorization to Deny Sinkhole Claim: Insurers may continue to deny the claim upon a determination that there is no sinkhole loss.

· Policyholder Demand for Sinkhole Testing: The bill specifies that the policyholder may demand sinkhole testing in writing within 60 days after receiving a claim denial if the insurer denies the claim without performing sinkhole testing and coverage would be available if a sinkhole loss is confirmed (i.e. the claim denial was not issued due to policy conditions or exclusions of coverage and instead was based the failure of the loss to meet the definition of sinkhole loss). However, if the policyholder requests such testing, it must pay the insurer 50 percent of the sinkhole testing costs up to $2,500. If the requested testing confirms a sinkhole loss the insurer must reimburse the testing costs to the policyholder.

Payment of Sinkhole Claims – The insurer continues to be required to pay to stabilize the land and building and repair the foundation upon the verification of a sinkhole loss. Payment shall be made to conduct such repairs in accordance with the recommendations of the professional engineer retained by the insurer under s. 627.707(2), F.S. The bill also clarifies that the insurer is required to give notice to the policyholder regarding payment of the claim.

The bill revises the statutory authorization specifying that the insurer may limit payment to the actual cash value of the sinkhole loss not including below-ground repair techniques until the policyholder enters into a contract for the performance of building stabilization repairs. The bill requires the contract for below-ground repairs to be made in accordance with the recommendations set forth in the insurer’s sinkhole report issued pursuant to s. 627.7073, F.S., and entered into within 90 days after the policyholder receives notice that the insurer has confirmed coverage for sinkhole loss. The time period is tolled if either party invokes neutral evaluation. Stabilization and all other repairs to the structure and contents must be completed within 12 months after the policyholder enters into the contract for repairs unless the insurer and policyholder mutually agree otherwise, the claim is in litigation, or the claim is in neutral evaluation, appraisal or mediation.

The bill specifies that if a covered building suffers a sinkhole loss or catastrophic ground cover collapse, the insured must repair such damage in accordance with the insurer’s professional engineer’s recommended repairs. However, if repairs cannot be completed within policy limits, the insurer has the option to either pay to complete the recommended repairs or tender policy limits.

Neutral Evaluation of Disputed Sinkhole Claims – The bill specifies that neutral evaluation must determine causation (whether a sinkhole loss has occurred and, if so, whether the observed damage was caused by sinkhole activity); all methods of stabilization and repair both above and below ground; the costs for stabilization and all repairs; and all information needed to determine whether a sinkhole loss has been verified and render an opinion on all matters at dispute in the neutral evaluation.

The neutral evaluator must be provided with information necessary to perform his or her duties. The bill requires that the neutral evaluator must be allowed reasonable access to the interior and exterior of the insured structures to be evaluated or for which a claim has been made. The policyholder must provide the neutral evaluator with all reports initiated on behalf of the policyholder that confirm a sinkhole loss or dispute the insurer’s sinkhole testing report. Such materials must be provided prior to the neutral evaluator’s physical inspection of the property. The bill revises the procedures and time frames for conducting the neutral evaluation. The parties are provided 14 business days to agree to a neutral evaluator. If an agreement cannot be reached, the Department of Financial Services (DFS) shall appoint a certified neutral evaluator. Each party may disqualify two neutral evaluators without cause; a reduction from 3 disqualifications under current law. The neutral evaluator has 14 business days after the referral to notify the parties of the date, time and place of the neutral evaluation conference; an increase from 5 business days in current law. The neutral evaluator must make a reasonable effort to hold the conference within 90 days after the DFS has received the request for neutral evaluation. Failure to conduct the conference within 90 days does not invalidate either party’s right to neutral evaluation. Current law requires that the neutral evaluation conference be held within 45 days.

The neutral evaluator’s report must be provided to the parties within 14 days after the completion of the neutral evaluation conference. A court proceeding related to the neutral evaluation must be stayed until 5 days after the filing of the neutral evaluator’s report with the court. If the neutral evaluator is not qualified to determine a disputed issue, he or she may enlist the assistance of another certified neutral evaluator, a professional engineer or professional geologist who is not a certified neutral evaluator, or a licensed general contractor to provide an opinion on that issue. Such person may be disqualified for cause in the same fashion as a neutral evaluator. The neutral evaluator may also request that the entity that performed the sinkhole investigation perform additional and reasonable testing that the neutral evaluator deems necessary. If the insurer agrees to comply with the neutral evaluator’s report, payments shall be made in accordance with the terms of the applicable insurance policy and s. 627.707(5), F.S. The bill also makes the following changes related to the neutral evaluation process:

· Specifies that neutral evaluation does not invalidate an insurance policy’s appraisal clause.

· Allows the parties to disqualify a neutral evaluator for cause based on specified familial or professional relationships.

· Requires admission of the neutral evaluator’s oral testimony and full report in any action, litigation or proceeding related to the claim.

· Specifies that the actions of the insurer in neutral evaluation are not a confession of judgment or an admission of liability.

· Deems neutral evaluators agents of the Department of Financial Services and grants them immunity from suit pursuant to s. 44.107, F.S.

Consider Your Options. Contact Us Today.

Before opening our law firm in 2006, our attorneys worked for some of the state’s, and nation’s, largest law firms, and worked representing the insurance companies for years. Our attorneys are now uniquely positioned to use that experience to assist individuals and businesses alike throughout Florida with their insurance claims. As a result, our attorneys are well versed in the impact insurance has on businesses, condominiums, and individuals alike. Our insurance litigation practice group is prepared to tackle your insurance claim.

Given our extensive experience litigating for, and against, insurance companies, our insurance litigation practice group is prepared to provide aggressive, efficient and effective representation on a broad spectrum of insurance claims in Florida for local, national, and international clients. We are prepared to advocate insurance claims at the pre-suit stage, trial, appellate and arbitration levels.

If you are facing a dispute over an insurance claim in Florida, contact Alvarez & Barbara, LLP, for a free and confidential consultation to discuss your rights.

Call us today toll free at 1-866-518-2913 or at 305-263-7700.

Cell Phones are Often the Only Form of Communication after a Hurricane Strikes

kevin8.jpgWhenever a hurricane makes landfall in a densely populated area, such as South Florida, the last thing you want to be without is a form of communication. Therefore, it is imperative to be prepared.

These days, a cellular phone will be the most likely way we will communicate with the rest of the world during and after a hurricane.

However, simply having your cell phone available for use is not enough. More steps need to be taken to ensure that you are ready for any event which may arise. For example, you should keep your cell phone battery charged at all times. Its also important to have a backup plan to recharge your battery in case there is a power outage. A good alternative is to charge your phone by using a car charger or having extra batteries at hand.

During any storm, the biggest threat to your cell phone is water. Water will likely damage a cell phone, so keep it safe by storing it in a plastic bag or some other type of protective covering. You should also make sure to save all necessary emergency contact numbers and emails. These numbers should include the police department, fire station and hospital as well as your family members.

If you have a camera phone, that’s great. Be prepared to take photographs, even video, of any property damage. Having photographs and/or video will help you in the event you file an insurance claim.

Taking photographs is of the utmost importance because your insurance company will ask you for photos of the damages to your property. Without these photographs, your insurance company is going to give you a tougher time with your claim as it makes it more difficult to prove damages without a photograph or video. As such, have your camera phone ready for use after a hurricane.

Sometimes providing photos and other requested documentation is simply not enough for an insurance company. Even with photos an insurer may treat you unfairly or mishandle your claim. At Alvarez & Barbara, LLP, we have the experience and knowledge to represent individuals, businesses, and community associations who are having difficulties with their insurance claim. In the event you feel you are being mistreated by an insurance company, don’t hesitate to contact us.

Review your Insurance Policy in Preparation for the Upcoming Hurricane Season

Thumbnail image for hurricane-hugo_100313415_l.jpg
South Florida hasn’t been directly hit by a hurricane since Wilma in 2005, so its easy to become complacent and not worry about another storm. However, its not a good idea to take this attitude because analysts are predicting a busy hurricane season.

As Floridians, its important to prepare for a hurricane. Its vital that we purchase water, batteries, and non-perishable food items. Protecting your home by putting up shutters is basically a must-do.Â

However, one thing many of us fail to prepare for is what to do in the instance our properties are actually damaged.

When was the last time you took a look at your insurance policy? The average person hasn’t looked at their policy in years. If you fall into this category, we recommend you take some time to review policy.

You should review your policy to see what you have to do if your home is damaged. Specifically, you need to look at the section which is most likely labeled “Duties After Loss”. Under these provisions, your policy sets out all the things you must do after finding damage. Failure to comply with these duties could result in your claim being denied.

Other than looking at your duties after a loss, make sure to look at whether your policy even covers windstorms or flood damage. You should also take the time to photograph or videotape your home, so that in the event of a claim you can show exactly what was damaged in a storm.

Another thing you should do is get the contact information for a Florida Association of Public Insurance Adjusters adjuster located in South Florida. Public adjusters are licensed professionals that represent and protect insured consumers during the tedious process of filing an insurance claim. A public adjuster will help ensure that your insurance company treating you fairly.

With hurricane season right around the corner its important to prepare for a hurricane and any ensuing damage. If we are unfortunately struck by a hurricane this season and you feel your insurer is mishandling your claim, don’t hesitate to contact us for a consultation. We have the experience and know-how to represent your best interests.Â

Florida’s Governor Signs Into Law a Bill that Aids Property Insurers and Permits Insurance Companies to Raise Insurance Rates BASENAME

cott-signing.jpgThis legislative session we’ve been telling you about the bill that would change Florida’s property insurance landscape. The proposed bill was pushed through by lawmakers despite the fact that Florida has not been hit by a hurricane since 2005. Well, that bill has now become a law.

Essentially, the new law was created so it could strengthen property insurance companies that cover damages from hurricanes, fires, and other losses. It is also designed to curb a recent surge in sinkhole claims which insurers believe are purely fraudulent. The sponsor of the new law stated it would “promote a competitive market with solvent companies that our policyholders can rely on.”

However, the law does have its critics. Detractors of the law state the law would lead to higher premiums for all property owners. Additionally, the law also imposes new restrictions on public adjusters, and sinkhole claims, as well.

Specifically, this law also allows annual rate increases of up to 15 percent to cover higher reinsurance costs. This provides insurance companies with yet another excuse to cash in while making consumers vulnerable to serial premium hikes — without fixing the underlying problems plaguing Florida’s property insurance system.

Florida’s property insurance system has been an almost annual legislative headache since shortly after Hurricane Andrew struck South Florida in 1992 — the Category 5 storm killed caused about $16 billion in insured damage. Indeed, former Gov. Charlie Crist last year vetoed a bill that was similar except for the sinkhole provisions. However, back in 2007 legislators tried to protect consumers from crippling rate increases, thinking that was the best way to go. But the law signed by Gov. Scott did away with many of those consumer friendly protections and enhanced the insurance companies to ability to fight against insurance claims.

The law signed by Gov. Scott will also allow insurance companies to justify a new round of rate hikes for all of the hard working Floridians. This is so because the higher reinsurance rates will be an invitation to let insurance companies raise rates.

The new law also tightens restrictions on sinkhole claims, which the insurance companies say are costing them $500 million annually, and allows insurers to hold back part of a claims settlement until repairs are completed.

But that is not all that this law does. The law caps public adjuster compensation to 20 percent of the claim payment (10 percent for Citizens claims). The law also requires public adjusters to provide additional disclosure statements and notices.

These changes come as no surprise as the insurance lobby was able to convince our elected representatives that public adjusters spearhead the filing of allegedly fraudulent claims such as sinkhole claims. However, any move that restricts public adjusters is a restriction on the average Floridian because these individuals represent people who are having difficulties with their insurance claims. Their role is vital to a fair claims system as they have the knowledge and experience to navigate the complex claims process.

Insurers have become stronger. Accordingly, the public has become weaker. This fact highlights the reason why its important to hire a firm with the experience necessary to compete against Goliath insurance companies. At Alvarez & Barbara, LLP, we have this experience and the proven track record to compete in this new climate. Contact us today to discuss your claim.

Get Ready to Have Your Property Insurance Rates Increased by at least 15% while Insurance Companies Make it Harder to Bring a Claim to Recover for Damages to Your Property

6a00d8341c64d253ef00e54f69334b8834-800wi.jpgThe legislative session in Tallahassee has ended. During this past legislative session lawmakers in Tallahassee had an objective of reforming Florida’s property insurance system. Consequently, property insurance was a big priority during the legislative session. Unfortunately, insurance companies, and not policyholders, are the big winners.

Our lawmakers passed Senate Bill 408 and now its up to Governor Rick Scott to decide whether the bill should become law.

Senate Bill 408, virtually guarantees a 15 percent premium “reinsurance” increase for Florida policyholders who have no choice but to buy property insurance on their homes if they have an outstanding mortgage. This is a backdoor tax and fee increase that will hurt most homeowners, consumers and small business owners at a time with very high foreclosure and unemployment rates, and a fragile economic recovery under way.

Moreover, homeowners who have no choice but to buy property insurance from Citizens Property Insurance Corp. will likely get the annual 10 percent increase, which continues to be authorized by law.

This premium increase comes after six years of no hurricanes and when the property and casualty insurance industry has record profits. Profits for U.S. property and casualty insurers rose 63 percent to $27 billion for the first nine months of 2010.

Senate Bill 408 also contains many other provisions that are anti-consumer as well. The reason being is that, for instance, the insurance lobby was able to convince our lawmakers that they needed to shorten the time in which hurricane and sinkhole claims could be brought. Insurers have been dealing with a large amount of claims that date back as far as 2005 in the aftermath of Wilma and also a recent rise in sinkhole claims. Instead of five years to file a windstorm claim, the bill proposes a 3 year limitation.

If this bill becomes law, policyholders are certainly going to be affected. Not only will their insurance rates go up, but many legitimate claims are going to be denied because of this restrictive time period. Water and mold damage often take a few years to present itself. Under the new law, someone who notices mold damage 3.5 years after the date of loss is out of luck. This provision does not take into account the fact that it can some time for damages to become evident. According to insurers, this provision is needed to curb fraud.

The bill also allows insurers to provide “additional or supplementary” information to the state without requiring top officers to certify that the data backing up their claim for a rate increase is truthful. Basically, this provision enables insurance companies to freely commit a fraud while they argue that time periods need to be shortened because of fraud. This is certainly a double standard.

Another troublesome provision of this bill is the fact that for people who pay for replacement cost insurance, in cases of hurricane repairs, homeowners will have to pay for some repairs in advance and hope to be reimbursed by the insurance companies. Many families simply can’t afford this burden, or wait for the insurance companies to “drag their feet” to pay these claims.

Times are tough enough as it is for many in Florida. This bill only makes it tougher on all hard working Floridians and helps insurance companies raise are rates without any oversight and with reckless abandon to Florida as a whole.

At Alvarez & Barbara, LLP, we have considerable experience dealing with insurance companies and claims. If you’re having difficulty with an insurance claim, contact Alvarez & Barbara, LLP to discuss your claim in greater detail today.

Florida’s Legislators Were Motivated to Reform Property Insurance Due to a Recent Rise in Sinkhole Claims

sinkhole.jpgInsurance companies may have won another battle to raise rates on hard working Floridians. They may have convinced Florida’s lawmakers to free them from providing comprehensive sinkhole coverage. Even though there is evidence which demonstrates that the rise in sinkhole claims are wholly legitimate, our legislators decided to side with insurance companies complaining about fraud and frivolous sinkhole claims. According to geologists, the recent rise in sinkhole reports can be attributed to the weather.

According to one geologist, you can almost predict sinkholes will occur when its dry and lots of water is pumped into an area. Also, the combination of low water levels and a big rain will lead to sinkholes. To illustrate this point, let’s take a look at some facts.

Between 1991 and 1998, we received normal levels of rainfall and 55 sinkholes were reported each year during that time period. From 1999 to 2001, we faced drought conditions and then the average number of reported sinkholes rose to 93 a year. The spike can be attributed to large amounts of water being pumped during the dry spell.

Currently, Hillsborough County is ripe for sinkholes because of the 2010 drought which was followed by a cold winter that saw many farmers pump water to protect their crops. In 2010, there were 171 sinkholes reported to the Department of Environmental Protection. 150 were in Hillsborough.

Despite a wholly innocent explanation for the rise in sinkhole claims, bills are being proposed that would remove the requirement for insurance companies to offer comprehensive sinkhole coverage. Some bills are proposing that insurance companies will only be required to offer coverage for total ground collapse, which basically means a whole structure falls into the sinkhole.

Its quite the shame that our elected officials are not taking into account the opinions of geologists who are providing an honest explanation for the rise in sinkhole claims. Sadly, it appears that our State can’t stand up to an insurance company when they are not telling the whole truth.

At Alvarez & Barbara, LLP we don’t take an insurance company for their word. On a daily basis, we aggressively represent homeowners, and businesses, who need help standing up to their insurance companies when they have been mistreated. Don’t hesitate to contact us if you find yourself having difficulty with your insurance company.

Are Insurance Companies Committing Fraud to Deny Legitimate Insurance Claims? According to a Recent Lawsuit Filed against Argus Fire & Casualty Company, it Happens Everyday

house on fire.jpgAnyone who has ever filed a claim with their homeowners insurance company, or any insurance company, for that matter, knows it can be quite an ordeal.

As part of basically every insurance contract the party paying all the insurance premiums in exchange for insurance coverage must fully cooperate with the insurance company during the course of the insurance company’s investigation once a claim is reported. If you don’t then the insurance company can deny coverage. The basis being that even though you have paid all those insurance premiums, you are in breach of contract by failing to adhere to the “cooperation clause” of your insurance contract with the insurance company.

Cooperating often entails producing any and all paper work related to the claim and handing over photos and videos of damage. The insurance company could also ask for claimants to show up at an examination under oath (EUO). Failing to show up to the EUO will allow an insurance company to deny your claim regardless of the damages and despite having paid all your premiums on time.

At an EUO the homeowner is often asked to show up at the insurers lawyers’ office and are asked questions under oath. Often times, our clients ask us, “Why are they making me do all of this? Do they think I’m making all of this up?” Unfortunately, insurance companies often think just that, and some times they even think that their policy holders are committing fraud.

However, it’s also a possibility that the insurance company is simply fishing for a reason to deny a wholly legitimate claim. In fact, they may be the ones who are making things up.

Its recently come to light in a whistle blower lawsuit that Argus Fire & Casualty Company may be inventing reasons to deny or delay legitimate claims. And the insurance company’s motive is no doubt greed and often driven exclusively by money. Put differently, and even though insurance companies gladly accept your premiums, and rake in millions and billions of dollars yearly, they often times don’t want to pay the smallest of claims in an effort to ensure that they keep all that money they raked in for themselves.

Susan Varela, a former adjuster for Argus Fire & Casualty Company, claims she was fired after blowing the whistle on the insurance company’s practice of denying claims that should have been covered. She’s also alleging that Argus has been defrauding reinsurers by submitting their very own false claims. Talk about irony – an insurance company denying claims submitted by their insureds but yet turning around and submitting false claims to the insurance company that insures the insurance company, the re-insurers.

If you have ever had to deal with an insurance company, then none of this should be surprising. Insurance companies are often times about as trustworthy as automobile salesmen: You had better read the fine print lest the deal could come back to kick you in the junk.

Consider Your Options. Contact Us Today.

Before opening our law firm in 2006, our attorneys worked for some of the state’s, and nation’s, largest law firms, and worked representing the insurance companies for years. Our attorneys are now uniquely positioned to use that experience to assist individuals and businesses alike throughout Florida with their insurance claims. As a result, our attorneys are well versed in the impact insurance has on businesses, condominiums, and individuals alike. Our insurance litigation practice group is prepared to tackle your insurance claim.

Given our extensive experience litigating for, and against, insurance companies, our insurance litigation practice group is prepared to provide aggressive, efficient and effective representation on a broad spectrum of insurance claims in Florida for local, national, and international clients. We are prepared to advocate insurance claims at the pre-suit stage, trial, appellate and arbitration levels.

If you are facing a dispute over an insurance claim in Florida, contact Alvarez & Barbara, LLP for a free and confidential consultation to discuss your rights.

Call us today toll free at 1-866-518-2913 or at 305-263-7700.

Insurance Companies are Gearing Up to Push Through Legislation That Will Result in Insurance Companies Paying Florida Homeowners Less Money on Sinkhole Claims and Making it Harder for Homeowners to Bring a Claim Against Their Insurance Company

sinkhole-2.jpgIn an effort to reduce costs for insurance companies, the State senate is pushing forward a bill which addresses sinkhole damage claims, as well as other claims.

The new bill is expected to contain many of the provisions found in a bill which was vetoed by Governor Charlie Crist. One of these provisions includes a time limit on filing claims after a hurricane and one which will make the rate approval process easier to navigate. It is also expected to address other cost drivers such as fraud.

The new bill will include provisions targeted at reducing what insurance companies are paying out for sinkhole claims. The insurance industry claims that many sinkhole claims are not legitimate. However, part of the reason for the surge in sinkhole claims is due in large part to the recent explosion in real estate development throughout Florida, especially in South Florida. Over development has left the ground susceptible to sinkholes. Plus, while sinkholes occur in other U.S. states, Florida is more prone to sinkhole related problems because of underground limestone that dissolves under certain conditions, especially in areas that have never been over developed, according to many leading geologists.

The state Senate’s Banking and Insurance Committee is expected to release an interim study on the state’s sinkhole insurance climate. Between 2006 and 2010, $2 billion in claims have been paid out. This payout amount nears the amount paid out in a small hurricane.

Insurance companies are concerned about these costs due to the large number of claims for foundation cracks that are attributed to sinkholes. However, the insurance industry states that these claims may not be sinkhole related. Because insurance companies contend that they cannot often rule out that the damage was caused by a sinkhole, especially in light of all the over development that has taken place over the past few years, tens of thousands of dollars are being paid out by the insurance companies to resolve these claims.

Our Miami insurance dispute lawyers handle sinkhole claims for homeowners. Our attorneys represented insurance companies before 2006, when we opened a firm dedicated to fighting for the rights of consumers. We understand how insurance companies work. And we have the knowledge and experience necessary to represent homeowners in disputes over an insurance claim.

The new bill is expected to contain language which will define structural damage from a sinkhole. It is also expected to contain language on what is and what is not covered by insurance policies. Governor-elect Rick Scott is expected to support this bill which may further regulate public adjusters.
—–
EXTENDED BODY:
If you are facing a dispute over an insurance claim in Florida, contact Alvarez & Barbara, LLP toll free at 866-518-2913 for a free and confidential consultation to discuss your rights.

Visit Our Other Blogs

logo-miami-resort-injury-lawyer

 

 

miami-real-estate-attorney-blog-footer-logo

Contact Us

No Fields Found.

Recent Entries

Florida Business Litigation Attorney
rated by Super Lawyers